Um espelho que reflecte a vida, que passa por nós num segundo (espelho)

05
Jul 16

Aproveitando as discussões intermináveis e provavelmente eternas sobre a existência da ALMA – como uma entidade absoluta pertencendo a um nível de existência imaterial, talvez separando matéria de energia, conservando o Espaço e eliminando o Tempo (deixando a paranoia da não ultrapassagem da velocidade da luz em vez de procurarmos oportunidades e atalhos) – deixo-vos aqui estes pensamentos de Angela Dijanic sobre o tema em questão, aqui expostos como uma versão científica da existência da mesma (num excerto retirado da 1ªparte de três do seu artigo Quantum souls publicado online no The Watchers).

 

angela_dijanic_quantum_souls_part_one_f.jpg

 

Quantum souls

(Angela Dijanic in The Watchers on July 3, 2016)

 

The idea that we are quantum beings having materialistic experiences is a challenging paradigm for us because we were born into a three dimensional linearly aligned physicality. And for too long, that physicality has been defined within the limitations of Newtonian Laws, or rather by the followers of those laws, often times  with their own interpretations - laws that place us as cogs and wheels in an enormous superficial machine with little room for forces beyond simple matter.

 

But we are not superficial machines that run on cogs and wheels. We are complex organisms made up of matter that is in turn made up of energy. Our physical bodies may fit neatly into Newton’s very limited world, but the force that drives these bodies, the intelligent energy that is behind thought and emotion, life and death, can only, for now, be explained through quantum science; and through the technologies we have not yet discovered or mastered.

 

Because of the nature of energy, we are very limited in our understanding of it, and so it becomes this magical thing that we either believe in or not… for now. But remember magic is simply science that has not yet been defined. Thus, anything that is too nebulous to understand, at the time, is labeled magic or philosophy.

 

We need to remember that at some point in history, in fact several points in history, everything we consider science now was considered magic then. By extension, everything that we consider magical now will be considered scientific in the future as technology evolves and understanding is gleaned. Even what we thought we understood, through scientific methodology, has changed. How many theories and hypotheses have been blown out of the water as we gain better insights?

 

We must remember that science is merely a human construct in and of itself. We fall under the excuse that magic is of gods, but science is of men. Not everyone believes in gods. Not everyone trusts the wisdoms of men.

 

We made science. We decided that magic and faith weren’t enough to go by so we created a system that would be more succinct and consistent, an attempt to even the playing field. But that succinctness and consistency is defined by us. We decide what succinct means.  We decide what consistent means. Humans created language. Then we fit our scientific ideals within those constructs. We are making this up as we go along.

 

Always, the various disciplines of science, regardless of type, focus or methodology, were developed through the minds, hands and hearts of humans using the tools available to us at the time- tools that we either discovered or created, like fire, hammers, and computers.

 

And, because science is a human construct, it is at the mercy of its creators. Just like magic. Like small gods giving birth to worlds, the creator and the created fused; and the philosophies grew with their followers. And so too did the limitations.

 

And yet everyone wants scientific proof of anything being espoused. Until they are given that proof, they label the entity as metaphysical, paranormal, or supernatural. But science is not about proof. It is about evidence. Science cannot prove anything because proof is subjective. The only person who can prove anything to me is me. Only I can decide if something is true or not. The evidence of the thing is objective. Evidence cannot buckle under opinion. It’s just data. Personal bias cannot sway evidence. It doesn’t matter what you think, the facts are just the facts.

 

Selective wiles and cyclical arguments are the hallmarks of close-minded, biased, judgmental people. Why do we care what fanatics from either extreme believe or do not believe? They are ignorant bullies who think that by using words bigger than the ones you use makes them superior and therefore they must be right. They may not be right.  

 

We have been taught to think in terms of human experiences and not soul experiences. This is a necessity since we are in a physical form in a dimension that is based on time and space. Unfortunately, we get tangled up in this physicality and forget how to communicate that which is most important to our existence. Perhaps that’s part of the experience. We simply need to break through the static.  

 

We are quantum souls living in a Newtonian world. Science is not the end all to be all, but it’s what we have so let’s use it responsibly recognizing the limitations.

 

(imagem e texto/inglês: thewatchers.adorraeli.com)

publicado por Produções Anormais - Albufeira às 17:57

CorretorEmoji

Se preenchido, o e-mail é usado apenas para notificação de respostas.


Julho 2016
Dom
Seg
Ter
Qua
Qui
Sex
Sab

1
2

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

10
11

17
18

30



Subscrever por e-mail

A subscrição é anónima e gera, no máximo, um e-mail por dia.

subscrever feeds
mais sobre mim
pesquisar
 
blogs SAPO