ALBUFEIRA

A Rússia de Vladimir Putin (segundo Paul Craig Rodgers)
O Encontro Internacional de Vladimir Putin (Valdai Discussion Club)

Vladimir Putin Is The Leader Of the Moral World
(Paul Craig Roberts – economist, commentator and former Assistant Secretary of the U. S. Treasure in Ronald Reagan Administration)

Paul Craig Roberts

Vladimir Putin’s remarks at the 11th meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club are worth more than a link in my latest column. These are the remarks of a humanitarian political leader, the like of which the world has not seen in my lifetime. Compare Putin to the corrupt war criminal in the White House or to his puppets in office in Germany, UK, France, Japan, Canada, Australia, and you will see the difference between a criminal clique and a leader striving for a humane and livable world in which the interests of all peoples are respected.

In a sane Western society, Putin’s statements would have been reproduced in full and discussions organized with remarks from experts such as Stephen F. Cohen. Choruses of approval would have been heard on television and read in the print media. But, of course, nothing like this is possible in a country whose rulers claim that it is the “exceptional” and “indispensable” country with an extra-legal right to hegemony over the world. As far as Washington and its prostitute media, named “presstitutes” by the trends specialist Gerald Celente, are concerned, no country counts except Washington. “You are with us or against us,” which means “you are our vassals or our enemies.”
This means that Washington has declared Russia, China, India, Brazil and other parts of South America, Iran, and South Africa to be enemies.

This is a big chunk of the world for a bankrupt country, hated by its vassal populations and many of its own subjects, that has not won a war since it defeated tiny Japan in 1945 by using nuclear weapons, the only use of such terrible weapons in world history.

As an American, try to image any known American politician, or for that matter any professor at Harvard, Princeton, Yale, or Stanford capable of giving an address to an educated discussion group of the quality of Putin’s remarks. Try to find any American politician capable of responding precisely and directly to questions instead of employing evasion.

No one can read Putin’s remarks without concluding that Putin is the leader of the world.

In my opinion, Putin is such a towering figure that Washington has him marked for assassination. The CIA will use one of the Muslim terrorists that the CIA supports inside Russia. Unlike an American president, who dares not move among the people openly, Putin is not kept remote from the people. Putin is at ease with the Russian people and mingles among them. This makes him an easy target for the CIA to use a Chechnya terrorist, a Jihadist suicide bomber, or the traditional “lone nut” to assassinate Putin.

The immoral, wicked, and declining West is incapable of producing leadership of Putin’s quality. Having defamed Putin, assassinating him will cause little comment in the Western media. (fonte – paulcraigroberts.org/25.10.2014)

Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club
(Russia)

Vladimir Putin

Algumas das ideias transmitidas pelo actual presidente russo Vladimir Putin, durante o seu discurso proferido no Valdai Internacional Discussion Club:

If the Security Council refuses to produce decisions – arms are used wherever and however, without any UN Security Council sanctions – then it is immediately declared to be an outdated and ineffective instrument.

Many states do not see any other ways of ensuring their sovereignty but to obtain their own bombs.

The use of a so-called first global pre-emptive strike may become tempting.

The next obvious threat is the further escalation of ethnic, religious, and social conflicts (creating places that are comfortable for terrorists and criminals, where piracy, human trafficking, and drug trafficking flourish).

Incidentally, at the time, our colleagues tried to somehow manage these processes, use regional conflicts and design ‘colour revolutions’ to suit their interests, but the genie escaped the bottle.

The same people are called fighters for democracy, and then Islamists; first they write about revolutions and then call them riots and upheavals. The result is obvious: the further expansion of global chaos.

The more we all face common problems, the more we find ourselves in the same boat, so to speak. Granted, some of our partners, for some reason, remember this only when it suits their interests.

Let me remind you about solving the problem of chemical weapons in Syria, and the substantive dialogue on the Iranian nuclear programme, as well as our work on North Korean issues, which also has some positive results. Why can’t we use this experience in the future to solve local and global challenges?

What could be the legal, political, and economic basis for a new world order that would allow for stability and security, while encouraging healthy competition, not allowing the formation of new monopolies that hinder development?

We must resolve the dilemma between the actions by international community to ensure security and human rights and the principle of national sovereignty and non-interference in the internal affairs of any state. The issue of maintaining sovereignty becomes almost paramount in maintaining and strengthening global stability.

I must say that even now, in trying to resolve the crisis in southeast Ukraine, the OSCE is playing a very positive role.

We had discussions on all topics related to Ukraine’s association with the EU, persistent discussions. They simply told us: this is none of your business, point, end of discussion. Instead of a comprehensive but – I stress – civilised dialogue, it all came down to a government overthrow; they plunged the country into chaos, into economic and social collapse, into a civil war with enormous casualties.

The Eurasian Economic Union’s formation process is a good example of such transparency. The states that are parties to this project informed their partners of their plans in advance, specifying the parameters of our association, the principles of its work, which fully correspond with the World Trade Organisation rules.

Colleagues, Russia made its choice. Our priorities are further improving our democratic and open economy institutions, accelerated internal development, taking into account all the positive modern trends in the world, and consolidating society based on traditional values and patriotism.

We have an integration-oriented, positive, peaceful agenda; we are working actively with our colleagues in the Eurasian Economic Union, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, BRICS and other partners.

The allegations and statements that Russia is trying to establish some sort of empire, encroaching on the sovereignty of its neighbours, are groundless. Russia does not need any kind of special, exclusive place in the world – I want to emphasise this. While respecting the interests of others, we simply want for our own interests to be taken into account and for our position to be respected. (fonte: President of Russia/kremlin.ru/24.10.2014)

(imagens – Web)

One Man Show!

Vladimir

"Back in the US, back in the US, back in the USSR"

(The Beatles)

(imagem – huffingtonpost.com)

An Ex-KGB-Agent of Capitalism first working for us (pardon the state), then working for him (pardon the privates): Dictator, Democratic or the same thing?

Nothing of that: only fighting for money only fighting for power. Like in my (your) country.

Vladimir

Vladimir is looking for a target to show the world the power of Russia: Sochi was only the announcement. Next phase's game? Maybe cutting the air to Ukraine and theirs neighbours and friends. But Vladimir priority objective – like Bush with Oil – it's only Europe. Russia will be one of the next world states leaders, controlling Europe and Asia with the other international monsters, China.

(imagem – huffingtonpost.com)